V. Evaluation Criteria
The below-mentioned criterion will be applied as per the category under which the proposal is submitted. These criteria will be used for scoring depending on their relevance for each format. For example, Roundtable format may have all four parameters being evaluated whereas Fireside chat may only be evaluated under two parameters.
- Relevance
Are the specific issues to be addressed by the proposal clearly correlated to the thematic tracks and relevant to the overarching theme of the APrIGF 2024? - Detail & Clarity
Does the proposal provide all information requested in the submission form, specifically: fully expounded issues, intended discussion outcomes, viable approach to discussion, and the choice of moderator/speakers (and their availability). The status of confirmation and relevance of panelists to the issues discussed will also be taken into consideration. - Inclusion and Diversity
Does the proposed session represent viewpoints from multiple stakeholders and provide diverse cultural, gender and geographical perspectives? Are there multiple stakeholder groups on the panel? Are the listed panelists qualified to represent various distinct stakeholder groups? Does the session contribute to the overall diversity of the APrIGF event? In particular, the Program Committee would like to see proposals that represent diversity in both the issues presented and the speakers nominated with respect to gender, disability and stakeholder groups. - Engagement
Does the format selected, the number of speakers and the length of the proposed session support participation from the audience? Does the proposal provide details of how the session will be run to promote discussion and engagement from the audience? Does the proposal state how to incorporate remote participation and contributions into the discussion? Does the proposal include plans of the session content preparations and distribution of topic issues among the speakers/panelists/organizers prior to the APrIGF event?
Additional Note
The MSG would like to see more collaborative discussions among the participants and panelists. A description of how you intend the session to be conducted i.e. a clear objective, method/process and scope for participation (from attendees) would help the Program Committee better understand your proposal.
The MSG strongly encourages each organizer to focus on submitting quality proposals to enhance the chance to be selected.
*Session Mergers: Upon evaluation, the MSG may suggest selected session organizers with thematically similar proposals to form mergers. This is to accommodate more diverse and quality sessions on the program agenda. Organizers are under no obligation to accept a merger, but may carry a risk of losing the opportunity to conduct their session.
